Anatomy of the Machine

The Components

The Carter 300 kW turbine is a lightweight, flexible system with a filament-wound spar that bends and twists to shed excess wind energy — two blades, a slender guyed tower, a compact downwind nacelle, and the winch that makes crane-free service possible.

A galvanised storage rack holding several grey composite Carter rotor blades with their aerofoil cross-section visible, outside the factory Composite Blades
Two Flexible Blades

The Blade

A teetering two-blade rotor built on the NASA LS-1 profile. The blades are deliberately flexible — they shed gust loads by bending rather than fighting them, cutting fatigue through the drivetrain and tower and allowing a far lighter machine.

  • 2-Blade Teetering Rotor
  • NASA LS-1 Profile
  • Flexible / Load-Shedding
  • Downwind
Close-up of the teeter bearing assembly at the rotor hub that supports the two blades, with wiring and a junction box visible Teeter Hub
Teeter bearing supporting the blades.

The blade hub is mounted on teeter bearings, which allow controlled movement of the rotor assembly. These bearings help absorb blade and hub vibrations, reducing the transmission of bending and torsional loads to the main drive shaft, gearbox, and tower structure. By accommodating dynamic rotor motions, the teeter system improves component life and enhances overall turbine reliability.

One of the most significant dynamic loading events occurs during sudden shutdowns, grid loss, emergency stops, or other operational interruptions. During these events, the tower can deflect into a pronounced “S-shape” as it absorbs and dissipates the rotor’s kinetic energy. This behaviour is a normal part of the turbine’s design and can appear quite dramatic to those unfamiliar with flexible wind turbine structures.

A pallet of cast aluminium blade counter-balance arms and root fittings in the factory yard Counter Balance Arms
Two Flexible Blades

Blade Counter Balance Arms

Cast counter-balance arms and root fittings that carry each blade at the teetering hub. Balancing the two-blade rotor keeps loads even through the drivetrain and tower, and the arms are produced as matched sets ready for assembly.

  • Cast Alloy Arms
  • Matched Sets
  • Teetering-Hub Mount
A Carter two-blade turbine head on its guyed tower against a blue sky, showing the counterbalance arms below the rotor
Overspeed Safety — Counterbalance arms — passive overspeed protection.

The counterbalance weights serve as an independent overspeed safety device. If the rotor speed increases beyond its design limit, the centrifugal forces acting on the weights at the ends of the arms increase proportionally. These forces generate a torsional moment on the blade assembly, causing the blades to automatically change pitch toward a stall position. As the blades stall into the feathered position, aerodynamic force is reduced, limiting rotor speed and slowing the turbine. Once the rotor speed has decreased to a safe level, the mechanical brake mounted on the drive shaft can be applied to bring the turbine to a controlled stop.

Close-up of the Carter turbine nacelle and counterbalance arm
Counterbalance arm detail.
Chart of aerodynamic torque versus rotor speed for one blade pitched at 30 m/s, with linear-fit equations for four pitch cases
One blade pitched — aero torque vs rotor speed (30 m/s).
Chart of rotor speed versus time after grid loss at 30 m/s, comparing one-blade pitch-up with normal pitch-up, with derived empirical equations
Grid-loss response — rotor speed vs time (30 m/s).
Plot of vertical force on the rotor in a non-rotating coordinate system over time (0 to 300), ranging roughly -10 to -40 thousand N, with the approximate extracted equation Fv(t) about -25 + 3.5 sin(0.15t) + 1.8 sin(1.8t) kN
Vertical Force on Teeter Pin — Fv(t) ≈ −25 + 3.5 sin(0.15t) + 1.8 sin(1.8t) kN
Typical fatigue and dynamic loading spectrum on blade and support assembly.
Plot of axial force on the teeter pin over time, with the approximate extracted equation Fa(t) about 28 sin(2.2t) + 4 sin(0.1t) kN
Axial Force on Teeter Pin — Fa(t) ≈ 28 sin(2.2t) + 4 sin(0.1t) kN
Typical fatigue and dynamic loading spectrum on blade and support assembly.
Aerial view of a full Carter rotor blade laid out on a workshop floor, instrumented with a row of loading actuators and weights along its length for a full-scale bending test Structural Test
Full-scale blade bending test.
A blade root section under a load rig on the workshop floor, set up to bend the filament-wound spar at its attachment to the root fitting Structural Test
Filament-wound spar attachment to root fitting bending test — location of maximum bending stress.
Finite-element von Mises stress analysis of the CWT filament-wound GFRP I-section spar under combined bending and torsion: 234 MPa peak at the fixed end, 142 MPa mid-span, 38 MPa at the tip, with material properties, section properties, the stress equation and a factor of safety of 2.35 FEA — Von Mises
CWT spar — von Mises stress (GFRP I-section). Peak 234 MPa at the fixed end; factor of safety 2.35 against the fibre-direction allowable.
Detail of a blade root: the white composite shell cut away to reveal the filament-wound spar seated against its metal root fitting Spar Root
Spar root detail.
Schematic
Spar curing oven.

From the Blade Shop

Period photographs from Carter blade production — spar protection and final finishing.

Blade spars over the treatment tank in the Carter factory — each welded steel spar is hot-dip protected end-to-end before the aerofoil shell goes on. Finished spars queue on the racks behind.
Blade spars over the treatment tank in the Carter factory — each welded steel spar is hot-dip protected end-to-end before the aerofoil shell goes on. Finished spars queue on the racks behind.
Blade root and pitch hardware being finished in the paint shop — the blade sits in a rotating fixture so the surfacer and topcoat go on evenly around the full section.
Blade root and pitch hardware being finished in the paint shop — the blade sits in a rotating fixture so the surfacer and topcoat go on evenly around the full section.
Galvanized tapered tubular tower sections laid out at the Carter Wind Turbines factory yard in the UK
Slender Guyed Mast

The Tower

A slim steel tower held upright by guy cables rather than a heavy free-standing tube. It carries the rotor with a fraction of the steel and sits on a much smaller foundation — lowering cost, weight, and ground disturbance.

The tower is fabricated from rolled steel plate welded into tapered tubular sections that are assembled on-site. During installation, adjacent tower sections are joined by drawing them together with a hydraulic ram, creating a strong and reliable connection.

It is intentionally designed with controlled flexibility to absorb the kinetic energy generated during rapid turbine shutdowns. By flexing and twisting under load, the structure reduces peak stresses and helps protect both the turbine and tower components from shock loading.

The tower base is mounted on a hinged foundation connection, allowing the structure to accommodate bending loads without transferring excessive moments into the foundation — improving structural efficiency and reducing foundation requirements.

All tower sections are sized to fit within a standard 40-foot shipping container, minimizing transportation costs and simplifying logistics for domestic and international deployment.

  • Welded Tapered Sections
  • Hydraulic-Ram Joints
  • Controlled Flexibility
  • Hinged Base
  • Ships in 40′ Container
Close-up of the main tower support at the hinged base, showing the pintle, bearing and bolted steel fittings that carry the tower Tower Base
Main tower support.
Close-up of a guy cable ground attachment: the cable swaged to a threaded turnbuckle and shackle bolted to the ground anchor Guy Anchor
Guy cable ground attachment anchor.
Close-up of the gin-pole attachment at the tower pivot, showing the hinge plates, pin and bolted steel fittings at the base Tower Pivot
Close-up of the tower base end fitting on the ground, showing the cast pivot bracket, bolt holes and spanners during assembly
Gin-pole attachment to tower pivot.
A Carter Wind Turbines crane-truck lifting a galvanised tower section into position at the Orton wind farm site, with more tower sections and a mobile crane laid out across the field behind Site Construction
Orton wind farm taking shape — once installed, no tall cranes are required. During the India construction we used a local farm tractor with a front-end loader to lift the nacelle and assist building the site.
A Carter turbine being raised on its guyed tilt-down tower using a gin-pole and ground winch, with workers in hard hats watching as the tower lifts toward vertical Tower Raising
Tower-turbine raising at Orton using a gin-pole — the nacelle assembly is as heavy as a truck.
A Carter Wind Turbines crane-truck with the nacelle and rotor lowered to ground level in a field
Comparison diagram of four wind-turbine tower types — guyed tilt-up, guyed lattice, freestanding lattice and freestanding monopole — shown in elevation and plan view with guy radius and tower base footprints Tower Types
Guyed vs Freestanding Towers — Footprint & Foundation Comparison
Labelled engineering cutaway drawing of the Carter nacelle assembly identifying the Blade Hub (P-100), Tower Joint (P-200), Generator (P-300), Gearbox (P-400) and Drive Shaft (P-500) Assembly Drawing
Power Conversion

The Generator

The generator converts the rotor’s mechanical power into electricity, sized to the machine’s 300 kW rating. Mounted in the downwind nacelle alongside the drivetrain, it is kept compact and serviceable so the whole power head can be brought to ground level for maintenance.

Direct coupling to the gearbox output keeps the assembly simple and reliable, and the unit is matched to the turbine controller for grid-synchronised output, instantaneous power measurement, and real-time fault and alarm monitoring.

  • 300 kW Rated
  • Grid-Synchronised
  • Gearbox-Coupled
  • Nacelle-Mounted
Power curve comparison chart: the CWT Model 300 reaches about 290 kW versus a typical turbine plateauing at 250 kW, plotted against wind speed from 4 to 24 m/s Power Curve
Power curve comparison — CWT Model 300 vs a typical turbine.
Interactive Estimator

Annual Energy & Income

Enter your site’s mean wind speed and electricity price. The estimate applies the CWT Model 300 power curve across a Rayleigh wind-speed distribution (the IEC standard derived from the mean) to predict yearly output and revenue for one turbine.

7.0
Capacity factor
Annual energy
Annual income

Estimate for a single CWT Model 300 turbine using a Rayleigh wind distribution and a typical 95% availability. Actual output depends on site turbulence, air density, wake losses, and grid availability. Indicative only — not a performance guarantee.

Interactive

Power & Energy Estimator

Adjust the inputs to see the wind-energy equations recalculate live. Defaults are example values for a Carter-class 300 kW machine — enter your own site figures to model your installation.

Design Inputs

Example values — adjust to your site
Captured Power
kW
Swept Area
Power in Wind
kW
Betz Maximum
kW
% of Betz Limit
%
Est. Annual Energy
MWh

Power Curve — Output vs Wind Speed

Illustrative model using standard wind-energy physics. Captured power is capped at the 300 kW rated output above rated wind speed, as a real turbine would limit via pitch/stall control.

Generator Build — Workshop

Period photographs from generator and drivetrain assembly.

Fitting the generator rotor to the main shaft in the workshop — the finned rotor slides onto the shaft taper, sling-supported until the fit is drawn up. The same shaft carries the rotor hub at its far end.
Fitting the generator rotor to the main shaft in the workshop — the finned rotor slides onto the shaft taper, sling-supported until the fit is drawn up. The same shaft carries the rotor hub at its far end.
The complete drivetrain trial-assembled on the shop floor: generator frame in the nacelle cradle, output coupling and slip-ring stack toward the yaw plate — checked as one unit before the shells close around it.
The complete drivetrain trial-assembled on the shop floor: generator frame in the nacelle cradle, output coupling and slip-ring stack toward the yaw plate — checked as one unit before the shells close around it.
Three Carter nacelle assemblies on pallets outside the Carter Wind Turbines factory, with the workshop and overhead crane behind Carter Wind Turbines · UK
Downwind Powerhead

The Nacelle

The compact nacelle houses the generator and drivetrain and sits downwind of the tower, so the rotor naturally tracks the wind with minimal yaw machinery. Kept light and simple, it is the part that comes to ground level for service.

Built and tested at our own workshop, each nacelle assembly is delivered ready to lift straight onto the tower pintle — here, a batch of completed units stands palletised outside the factory ahead of dispatch.

  • 300 kW Rated
  • Downwind Yaw
  • Compact Drivetrain
  • Low Mass
Engineering sectional drawing of the Carter gearbox and main shaft assembly, showing bearings, shaft seals and the 65 rpm input rated for 78-foot diameter blades Drivetrain
Gearbox Assembly — Blade Attached Directly
Carter nacelle covers and rotor components packed inside a shipping container bound for New Zealand In Transit
Shipping & Logistics

Nacelle Covers On Shipment

The lightweight composite nacelle covers nest together for efficient transport. Here a set is packed into a standard shipping container ahead of export — part of a consignment bound for New Zealand.

  • Nested Composite Covers
  • Container-Packed
  • Export Ready
Great Orton, Cumbria Movable Carter winch and its reinforced concrete winch pad in a field, cables running up to the guyed tower
The Winch · Crane-Free Service

Winch and Winch Pad

A ground-level winch lowers and raises the entire hinged tower under controlled tension — no crane and no tower climbing, which makes the Carter machine ideal for remote sites and dramatically cheaper to install and maintain.

The turbine is equipped with a winch and a reinforced concrete winch pad. The winch is movable, allowing a single winch to be shared among multiple turbines within a small wind farm.

This approach reduces installation and maintenance costs while providing flexibility for turbine erection, lowering, inspection, and servicing operations. The winch pad provides a stable, durable foundation for safe operation under all weather conditions.

  • Controlled Tilt-Down
  • No Crane Needed
  • Ground-Level Service
  • Single-Visit Maintenance
The Orton mobile winch on its pad with the gin-pole attached, rigged and ready to lower the tilt-down tower Great Orton, Cumbria
Orton mobile winch. Gin-pole attached lowering the winch to its ground bolts getting ready to tilt the tower over.
The Controller · TMC3

A Purpose-Built Turbine Controller

The controller monitors the live operation of the turbine and all associated assemblies and reports operational data remotely to the operations center via a cellular link. Operations personnel can monitor and control each turbine day to day and measure power output instantaneously, with alarms, faults, and warnings detected and communicated in real time.

Recognizing the need for improved safety, reliability, and operational efficiency, Steve entered into a joint venture with Orbital Sciences of Denmark to develop a new turbine controller.

The controller was designed in-house and jointly developed with Jens and the engineering team at Orbital Sciences. Following development and testing, the controller was manufactured by Orbital for deployment across the Carter Wind Turbines fleet.

The new system incorporated the latest electronic interfaces, enhanced sensor technology, and improved communications capabilities. These advancements provided greater operational awareness, increased reliability, more accurate performance monitoring, and enhanced safety throughout turbine operation.

  • Live Remote Monitoring
  • Cellular Link
  • Instant Power Readout
  • Real-Time Alarms & Faults
Annex B wind farm system diagram: a 300 kW induction generator turbine with a 0.415/11kV 500kVA transformer feeding 11kV switchgear, groups of turbines 2-5, 6-10, 11-15 and 16-20, an 11/0.415kV control building auxiliary supply, and an 11/33kV transformer to the PES 33kV system through a metering circuit breaker and point of isolation
Annex B — Wind Farm System Diagram (point of connection and common coupling to the PES 33kV network)
Single-line electrical schematic of the Orton wind farm: ten 300 kW two-blade turbines (WT1 to WT10) grouped to three substations at 11kV and 415V, with G59 protection, incoming supply, turbine HV isolation and HV import/export metering to the NORWEB grid
The wind farm grid connection was isolated to 3 separate switchgear.
Interior of a Carter turbine control cabinet showing the Active Control boards, I/O interface, relay logic board, terminal blocks and field wiring
Inside the control cabinet — Active Control boards, I/O interface, relay logic and field wiring.